Merge[]
I think we should merge these two articles together since the Salmon article refers to both types of salmon. I know that the raw and cooked food variants are separate, but then we would have to change the Salmon article to provide information about the Cooked variant and move the information about the Raw Salmon to the Raw Salmon article. This process would take some time to do, so that is why I am up for merging.
-NinjaDogDB (talk) 19:24, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
^ I agree DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E)
- I agree; however, that'll cause some non-standardization, as the raw fish and cooked fish articles would deserve to be merged (but the new article can't be "fish" as that's already taken). If non-conformity is not an issue, however, then you have my full support.SLScool (message wall) 21:32, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
The standard for this wiki is actually to keep articles like this separate. Examples are:
- Raw Beef vs Steak
- Raw Chicken vs Cooked Chicken
- Chorus Fruit vs Popped Chorus Fruit
- Raw Mutton vs Cooked Mutton
- Potato vs Baked Potato
- Raw Rabbit vs Cooked Rabbit
- Salmon vs Cooked Salmon
- (I suspect there are other examples I am missing)
This standard was apparently decided upon long ago, and has been applied to many articles across the wiki. If anything, we should be adding additional information to the Raw Salmon article, if we're adhering to the standard for the wiki. I also oppose splitting these articles, as these two items have a different source, different uses, and a different appearance.
-Sitb (talk) 22:46, April 21, 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, after what Sitb said, I'm gonna oppose. DanzxvFan8275 (M•C•U•E)